I commented on Heather's literature review in Group 3 - Experiential Learning
Social Cognitive Learning
Desiree M. Soptelean
Ball State University
Literature Review
EDAC 634
Professor Bo Chang
Social
Cognitive Learning
Social cognitive learning is a broad
topic that reaches into many other areas of adult learning. As defined in the 2007 textbook Learning in Adulthood by Merriam,
Cafarella, and Baumgartner, social cognitive learning theory combines elements
from behaviorist and cognitivist orientations with the explicit assumption that
people learn from observing others. Merriam, et al. go on to say that in
observing others people acquire knowledge, rules, skills, strategies, beliefs,
and attitudes. These characteristics allow social cognitive theory to be used
widely in the field of workplace training and development, which is a quickly
growing area as the workforce becomes more educated than ever before and
employers must compete to attract and retain the best and brightest employees.
For this literature review I chose to
investigate the area of social cognitive learning that reaches into the areas
of training and development, employee socialization, and on the job training. I
have personally experienced newcomer job training several times, and my
experiences have been both positive and negative. While I’ve had both types of
experiences, it is always the negative experiences that stand out to me, so I
chose to explore further why beginning a new job may be difficult, and what can
the employer and employee do to improve the process.
General
Themes
Theme 1: First experiences
for newcomers in an organization set expectations and perceptions of the job
and organization.
The
first days and week of a new job are often a whirlwind of activity, new faces,
and new information to learn. The newcomer to the job is not only learning a
new skillset or set of information, but also new processes, new coworkers, new
names, a new building, and the list goes on. In a 2003 article, De Vos, Buyens,
and Schalk state their findings indicate it is highly important for
organizations to give careful attention to the initial experiences by new
hires. They state the active communication about expectations held by both the
employee and employer will positively effect the relationship between employee
and the organization.
In Bandura’s 2001 article, Social
Cognitive Theory of Mass Communication, the statement is made that human
behavior may be explained in terms of unidirectional causation, meaning “behavior
is controlled either by environmental influences or by internal dispositions.” Because
behavior is not strictly governed by one or the other shaping force, all
aspects must be considered in the early encounters an individual has within an
organization. Bandura states that “In this transactional view of self and
society, personal factors in the form of cognitive, affective, and biological
events, behavioral patterns, and environmental events all operate as
interacting determinants that influence each other bidirectionally.” He also
states that a defining characteristic of humans is their plasticity in
adapting, which in my opinion, is something that should be equally kept in mind
by employers when considering introducing newcomers to an organization.
However, this careful attention to
detail to the first days of a new job is not always given by all employers.
Many newcomers reported in a 2015 article by Korte, Brunhaver, and Sheppard
that they learned largely through trial and error and the informality of their
initial experiences left them with the feeling that their time was wasted, as
they were not always sure of the correct way of doing things. In this same
article by Korte, et al, managers reported that they favored a more informal, “experiential”
training. Clearly there is a disconnect somewhere between managers and employees
about what effective training techniques look like. In addition to a lack of
formality, newcomers also reported dissatisfaction with an initial general orientation,
as they did not yet possess the context to retain information.
Theme 2: Organizational
socialization is a process by which overall work load may be improved.
Organizational
socialization is a process that is constantly occurring within an organization,
and in this specific context, within a workplace. In the orientation process,
socialization is often thought of as only affecting the newcomer to the
organization, but it involves established agents just as much. Korte, et al
posit that learning is not the only objective of socialization, but
socialization is the context in which newcomers and established employees
interact. A key ingredient to socialization, or what may also be referred to as
collective agency, is people’s shared belief in their collective power to
produce desired results (Bandura, 2001a). The overall performance by a social
group involves transactional dynamics between members, and thus creates shared
responsibility, and ultimately success, by group members instead of a single
person. In this instance, creating a social environment where newcomers and
seasoned employees share social responsibility will allow for more genuine,
valuable interactions.
Lin (2010) states that in a work
environment it may not be possible to reduce a work load beyond a certain
point, and this is where socialization is effective. Social capital, as it is
also referred to by Lin, is important because people count on other people (social
networks) in times of stress, sharing joy, crisis, and in sharing the job load.
Without this human element in the workplace, some especially taxing workplaces
may not be able to retain employees.
Theme 3: Individual
differences of newcomers in an organization effect likelihood of engaging in
organizationally committed behaviors.
In
a Bandura’s 2001 article, Social Cognitive Theory: An Agentic Perspective, he
comments on self-regulation, stating, “The rapid pace of informational, social,
and technological change is placing a premium on personal efficacy for
self-development and self-renewal throughout the life course.” The work world
is experiencing a fast pace of change, and knowledge and technical skills
quickly become outdated. Bandura states that not only does the worker needs to
engage in behaviors to remain engaged in the organization they are a part of,
but collective agentic adaptability applies to the organizational level and
workforce levels.
In studying human behavior, every person
is completely different and will behave differently from coworkers when placed
into the work environment. Researchers Tang, Lie, Oh, and Weitz list in their
2013 article three self initiated employee socialization tactics in which each
person will respond differently: observation, inquiry, and networking. Each
person will possess a different orientation toward each area and thus perform
differently. The most proactive newcomer listed by Tang, et al is associated
with responding highly in all three areas.
In Korte’s 2007 article, the
newcomer is also tasked with 4 tasks to be mastered when beginning a job:
mastering job tasks, clarifying the role, integrating into the workgroup, and
assimilating into the organization’s culture. These are the basic steps to be fulfilled
no matter what type of training and orientation process takes place, and
because of this, they may be completed in any number of ways. A final thought
of Korte in this article was that informal learning is the most pervasive type
of learning in an organization. I interpreted this to mean that newcomers and
seasoned employees alike should be aware of their own learning style in order
to be successful.
Implications
One element of social cognitive
learning theory that arose across my research is the idea that human behavior
can be influenced by almost any factor and remains malleable across situations.
Humans are adaptable, and so even if a person has initially failed at a task,
after some time of practice and study, he or she may later be able to master
the task. Conversely, the world of technology is so quickly changing that even
if a person has mastered one skillset, that does not mean that that ability
will translate to the next skillset that is necessary in his or her
organizational field. When this happens, the individual must self-regulate and
take on the responsibility of learning the new skillset.
Another overreaching theme throughout my
reading is the disconnect between what employees think is good training and
what employers think is good training. Many times throughout the literature it
was suggested that discussion be used to explore the expectations held by both
parties, so each knows where the other stands. I think beyond this though
communication is a key factor in a successful job training. In training
employees, I look for those who have questions, who look for something that
they do not know, but desire to know. Even just asking what questions a newcomer
has allows them to see that you are open to questions, and you are available to
talk to in the future, even if they do not need to talk to you at that moment.
The importance of social capital is
another theme that arose several times throughout the literature. It is not an
area that can be quantified or measured, but researchers give credence to the
power of having a support system of people that a person feels they belong
with. Like many of the other points made throughout this review, I can attest
that having a social network of people you can trust, not only with your work,
but with your stress, joy, and other emotions can make the difference between a
mediocre workplace and a great workplace.
Reflection
Highlights
I think the most unique part of my
project has been all of the practical experiences I possess that I have been
able to link to my research. I have worked in companies that have utilized both
the good and bad types of training styles that I have discussed here, and that has
been a huge help in informing my opinion and guiding the direction of my
research. I also look forward to being able to apply these principles practically
in the future, if not as a professional administering training then at least as
a new hire in a future position.
Process
The process of completing this assignment
has been very long. I started out very interested in the topic and excited to
begin research, but then became extremely busy with my full time job, and did
not feel as connected to the topic after a while. However, once I was able to
come back and connect my own experiences, both and good and bad, to the topic
of social cognitive learning, I began to form a plan for the direction I wanted
to take the literature review. The biggest problem for me in completing this
assignment was being able to concentrate to read the articles. I have been
having trouble concentrating for any length of time to do just about anything
recently, so this was definitely a struggle. I would recommend to others who
are writing a literature review in the future to begin the reading a long time
before they plan to begin writing, because not all articles are equally as easy
to read and understand.
Tables
Table
1. Summary of the literature review
Main Themes in Literature
|
Application of Main Themes in
Literature
|
THEME 1: First experiences for newcomers in an
organization set expectations and perceptions of the job and organization.
|
·
Human
behavior is is controlled by either environmental influences or by internal
disposition.
·
General
orientations have been reported to be unhelpful because newcomers to an
organization have no context of the information they are given.
·
Newcomers
report a desire for more formal training in the early days
·
Organizations
need to pay attention to newcomers first experiences, especially in regards
to active communication
|
THEME 2: Organizational socialization is a
process by which overall work load may be improved.
|
·
Socialization
is not only about newcomers, but also involves seasoned employees
·
Key
ingredient to socialization (or collective agency) is people’s shared belief
in their collective power to produce desired results
·
It
may not be possible to reduce load, but social capital may help ease abnormal
cognitive load
|
THEME 3: Individual differences of newcomers in
an organization effect likelihood of engaging in organizationally committed behaviors.
|
·
The
rapid pace of informational, social, and technological change is placing a
premium on personal efficacy for self-development and self-renewal.
·
Three
self initiated employee socialization tactics: observation, inquiry,
networking. Each employee will be oriented differently toward each area.
·
Four
tasks to be mastered by newcomers: mastering job tasks, clarifying role,
integrating into work group, assimilate into organizational culture.
·
Informal
learning is the most pervasive type of learning in organizations – important to
be aware of learning type.
|
References
Bandura, A. (2001a). Social cognitive
theory: An agentic perspective. Annual
Review of Psychology, 52, 1.
Bandura, A. (2001b). Social cognitive theory of mass communication. Media
Psychology, 3, 3 (265-299).
De Vos, A., Buyens, D., & Schalk, R.
(2003). Psychological contract development during organizational socialization:
Adaptation to reality and the role of reciprocity. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, 537-559.
Korte, R. (2007). The socialization of
newcomers into organizations: Integrating learning and social exchange
processes. University of Minnesota.
Korte, R., Brunhaver, S., & Sheppard,
S. (2015). (Mis)Interpretations of organizational socialization: The
expectations and experiences of newcomers and managers. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 26, 185-208.
Lin, C. (2010).
Understanding negative impacts of perceived cognitive load on job learning
effectiveness: A social capital solution. Human
Factors and Ergonomics Society, 52, 627-642.
Merriam, S. B.,
Caffarella, R. S., & Baumgartner, L. M. (2007). Learning in Adulthood. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
Tang, C., Liu Y., Oh, H., & Weitz, B.
(2014). Socialization tactics of new retail employees: A pathway to
organizational commitment. Journal of
Retailing, 90, 62-73.
No comments:
Post a Comment