I commented on Group 5 Experiential Learning Program Design
Social Cognitive Learning
Desiree M. Soptelean
Ball State University
Program Design
EDAC 634
Professor Bo Chang
Introduction
Social cognitive learning theory may
be applied in many areas of adult learning, including both classroom and workplace
settings. My program was designed for implementation in a workplace setting,
specifically using aspects of organizational socialization practices to create
a newcomer orientation and training schedule. The learners in my program will
be newly hired behavioral therapists at an ABA Clinic. The week-long training
schedule I have developed will address multiple needs including the need for
task-related training, organizational training, provide a space to discuss
expectations held by both management and the employee, and will introduce
opportunities for organizational socialization. A typical training plan for an
ABA Clinic would last longer than one week, but to avoid repetitiveness I have
included all essential parts of my plan in Week One. The intention of the
program is to increase therapist job satisfaction, which will in turn create
organizational loyalty and reduce negative effects and costs associated with
high employee turnover rates.
Rationale
One point I borrowed from the
literature includes not fitting as much information as possible in a general
orientation from the very beginning, as the newcomer has no context to apply
the knowledge, as stated by Korte, Brunhaver, and Sheppard in their 2015
article. The desire for a more formal learning experience, where an employee
knows exactly what will be taking place is another aspect from the literature I
incorporated into my program design.
I have tried to keep in mind the idea
from Bandura’s (2001b) article, that behavior may be equally controlled by
environmental influences or by internal dispositions, and have allowed for
multiple types of learning and interactions to take place. In doing this, the
newcomers will have the ability to try different ways of learning, and if one
works better than another they may provide feedback on that. They may also use
this information to self-regulate and encourage their own learning in the
future, as spoken about by Bandura in his 2001, article Social Cognitive
Theory: An Agentic Perspective.
The
company I have based a lot of my training program on is a retail company called
Anthropologie where I used to be a part of a management team responsible for
training newly hired associates. The location I worked out of was Indianapolis
and the headquarters of the company was located in Philadelphia, PA. Because we
hired new hires on an irregular, rotating basis, there was not a set schedule
that was followed rigidly, but we did have an orientation and training process
that every employee went through. At the beginning of the process, documents
were filed, company history and values covered, and then the employee was
gradually introduced to the store. We began with the back of house area,
familiarizing the employee with processes and procedures. The first shifts were
always shorter, allowing time to digest the information. As the employee came back
for subsequent shifts, more training responsibilities were added, until they
became self-sufficient and confident to be on their own.
In my program design I borrowed the
idea of starting slowly and warming up, adding more information each day. I did
not have the behavioral therapist to begin right away observing clients,
because without a base foundation of knowledge, their time would be wasted and
no knowledge would be able to be retained.
Program
My program is a detailed schedule for the
first week of on the job training for newly hired behavioral therapists at an
ABA Clinic. I have included notations in italicized parentheses as appropriate to
note which part of the social cognitive learning process of organizational
socialization I have connected the related activities. The schedule will be
given to the newcomers at the beginning of Day 1, so they will know what to
expect each day of the upcoming week, contributing to active communication and
creating a formalized training process in the early days of the training
process.
WEEK 1 NEW HIRE SCHEDULE
|
||||
DAY 1
8:30-11:00
-Onboarding
paperwork
-Organizational
introduction
-Tour
11-11:30
Lunch
11:30-12:30
Observe/train
on lunchroom procedures (Observation)
12:30-3:30
Skills/operant
training
|
DAY 2
8:30-9:30
Observe AM
Client (Observation)
9:30-11:00
Skills/Operant
training
11-11:30
Lunch
11:30-12:30
Observe/train
on lunchroom procedures (Observation)
12:30-1:30
Observe PM
client (Observation)
1:30-3:30
-Discussion (allow time for sense-making,
retrospective)
-Skills/operant
training
-Personality
assessment
|
DAY 3
8:30-11:30
CPR/First Aid
training
11:30-12:30
Lunch with
other New hires (Networking)
12:30-1:30
Observe PM
Client (Observation)
1:30-3:30
-Discussion (allow time for sense-making, retrospective)
-Skills/operant
training
|
DAY 4
8:30-11:00
Observe AM
Client (Observation)
11-11:30
Lunch
11:30-12:30
Observe/train
on Lunchroom procedures (Observation)
12:30-3:30
Observe PM
Client (Observation)
3:30-4:45
Partner with
seasoned staff to complete end of day tasks (Observation, Networking, Inquiry)
|
DAY 5
8:30-11:30
Discussion
with Program Coordinator (supervisor)
-Expectations
of employee and supervisor
-Initial
thoughts
(Networking, Inquiry)
11:30-12:30
Lunch with
staff
12:30-3:30
Program
training with Program Coordinator (Observation,
Networking, Inquiry)
|
Reflection
I
think the most unique part of my program design is that I was able to build on
my own experiences to not only critique what has been done, but to create my
own program. I have been able to both train and be trained for a multitude of
jobs, and feel that this will assist in the future if this is an area that I
choose to work in.
This was a process that happened
pretty organically for me. Once I began reading the literature it reminded me
of a lot of my past experiences, and I was able to draw a lot on those,
especially the ones I thought could have been improved upon.
Tables
Table
1. Summary of the literature review
Main Themes in Literature
|
Application of Main Themes in
Literature
|
THEME 1: First experiences for newcomers in an
organization quickly set expectations and perceptions of the job and
organization.
|
·
General
orientations have been reported to be unhelpful because newcomers to an
organization have no context of the information they are given.
·
Newcomers
report a desire for more formal training in the early days
·
Organizations
need to pay attention to newcomers first experiences, especially in regards
to active communication
|
THEME 2: Organizational socialization is a
process by which overall work load may be improved.
|
·
Socialization
is not only about newcomers, but involves seasoned employees also
·
It
may not be possible to reduce load, but social capital may help ease abnormal
cognitive load
|
THEME 3: Individual differences of newcomers in
an organization effect likelihood of engaging in organizationally committed
behaviors.
|
·
Three
self initiated employee socialization tactics: observation, inquiry,
networking. Each employee will be oriented differently toward each area.
·
Four
tasks to be mastered by newcomers: mastering job tasks, clarifying role,
integrating into work group, assimilate into organizational culture.
·
Informal
learning is the most pervasive type of learning in organizations – important
to be aware of learning type.
|
Table
2. Summary of the literature review
Learners
|
Newcomer Behavioral
Therapists
|
Purposes
|
Equip newcomer
behavioral therapists to perform their responsibilities to the best of their
ability while creating positive organizational social relationships
|
Objectives
|
·
Equip
therapists to do their jobs correctly and confidently
·
Introduce
the organizational structure
·
Discuss
expectations of management and employee
·
Introduce
opportunities for organizational socialization
|
Rationales – Ideas from Literature
|
·
No
general orientation
·
More
formal training
|
Rationales – Features from practical
cases
|
·
Slow
build to self-sufficiency
|
Highlights and the major components of
the program you designed
|
·
Applying
personal experiences and opinions to the literature and my
|
References
Bandura, A. (2001a). Social cognitive
theory: An agentic perspective. Annual
Review of Psychology, 52, 1.
Bandura, A. (2001b). Social Cognitive
Theory of Mass Communication. Media
Psychology, 3, 3 (265-299).
Korte, R., Brunhaver, S., & Sheppard,
S. (2015). (Mis)Interpretations of organizational socialization: The
expectations and experiences of newcomers and managers. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 26, 185-208.
No comments:
Post a Comment